-
Recent Posts
-
Recent Comments
Categories
- About this blog (1)
- Arendt (2)
- Current Affairs (7)
- Ethics (1)
- Evolution (4)
- Feyerabend (13)
- Film (2)
- Galileo (5)
- Historiography (4)
- History (3)
- History and Philosophy of Science (23)
- History of Science (7)
- Javier Marías (2)
- Literature (8)
- Morality (1)
- Philosophy (26)
- Philosophy of History (2)
- Philosophy of Religion (15)
- Philosophy of Science (13)
- Politics (14)
- Religion (15)
- Science (15)
- The Kindly Ones (4)
Tags
Arendt authority climate change contingency copernicus creationism demarcation determinate determinateness determinism einstein eternalism evil Evolution feyerabend freedom free will galileo galileo affair historiography history of science indeterminate indeterminateness instrumentalism intelligent design kuhn lakatos laudan Life and Fate literature Littell methodology parsimony pennock Philosophy of Science popper proliferation realism scientific method scientific research skepticism Stephen Hawking tenacity truth Vasily GrossmanBlogroll
Recommended Reading
Follow us on Twitter: @bienveillantes
- Hegel and the development of Feyerabend's thought wp.me/p14UML-9M 5 months ago
Archives
- March 2012 (1)
- December 2011 (2)
- November 2011 (1)
- October 2011 (1)
- September 2011 (1)
- August 2011 (2)
- July 2011 (2)
- June 2011 (2)
- May 2011 (4)
- April 2011 (4)
- March 2011 (2)
- February 2011 (2)
- January 2011 (3)
- December 2010 (3)
- November 2010 (11)
- October 2010 (7)
- September 2010 (1)
Meta
Monthly Archives: May 2011
The Synthese Debacle and the Louisiana Legislature
Much has been written about how the editors of the philosophy journal, Synthese, botched the handling of objections which were raised about at least one or two of the articles in the Evolution and Its Rivals special issue (Volume 178, … Continue reading
More on Lutz, Laudan, and Demarcation
In On Lutz on Laudan and demarcation, Paul Newall notes that: In his (draft) paper On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Demarcation Criteria of Science, Sebastian Lutz claims that demarcation does not require a criterion that is both a necessary … Continue reading
On Lutz on Laudan and demarcation
In his (draft) paper On an Allegedly Essential Feature of Demarcation Criteria of Science, Sebastian Lutz claims that demarcation does not require a criterion that is both a necessary and sufficient condition, as had been discussed in Laudan’s famous paper … Continue reading
Second Response to ‘The Politics of Demarcation’
Abstract. The most widely disseminated arguments against Intelligent Design have failed to produce invariant and objective demarcation criteria sufficient to establish that ID cannot be a matter of science. Ultimately, ID opponents rely heavily upon the fact of there being … Continue reading
